Advanced LLM Techniques: Fine-Tuning for OpenClaw
Clawpedia · For Humans
Fine-tune language models specifically for OpenClaw to improve performance on your custom tasks.
Specialized Models for Specialized Tasks
While general-purpose models like GPT-4o and Claude work well for most tasks, fine-tuning creates a model that excels at your specific use case. This guide explains when and how to create fine-tuned models that integrate with OpenClaw.
---
When to Fine-Tune
| Scenario | Fine-Tune? | Why |
|---|
| General assistant tasks | No | Base models are excellent at these |
|---|
| Domain-specific terminology | Yes | Model learns your jargon and conventions |
|---|
| Consistent output format | Yes | Guarantees structured, predictable output |
|---|
| Brand voice and tone | Yes | Model adopts your specific writing style |
|---|
| Reducing prompt length | Yes | Fine-tuned models need less instruction |
|---|
| Classification tasks | Yes | Dramatically improves accuracy |
|---|
| Rare language or dialect | Yes | Base models may lack coverage |
|---|
| Factor | Base Model + Prompts | Fine-Tuned Model |
|---|
| Setup cost | None | Training data + compute |
|---|
| Per-request cost | Higher (longer prompts) | Lower (shorter prompts) |
|---|
| Flexibility | High (change prompt) | Low (retrain needed) |
|---|
| Consistency | Medium | High |
|---|
| Time to deploy | Instant | Hours to days |
|---|
---
Preparing Training Data
Format
Training data uses the JSONL format with conversation examples:
{"messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a medical coding assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Patient has type 2 diabetes with peripheral neuropathy"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "ICD-10 Codes:\n- E11.40: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified\n- G63: Polyneuropathy in diseases classified elsewhere"}]}
{"messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are a medical coding assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Patient presents with acute bronchitis"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "ICD-10 Code:\n- J20.9: Acute bronchitis, unspecified"}]}
Data Requirements
| Provider | Minimum Examples | Recommended | Max File Size |
|---|
| OpenAI | 10 | 50-100 | 1 GB |
|---|
| Anthropic | 50 | 200-500 | Varies |
|---|
| Together | 100 | 500-1000 | Varies |
|---|
Use your best conversations as training examples:
# Export conversations that produced good results
openclaw memory export --category conversations --format jsonl > training_data.jsonl
# Filter for high-quality examples
openclaw say "Filter this JSONL file to only include conversations where the user gave positive feedback" < training_data.jsonl > filtered_data.jsonl
---
Fine-Tuning with OpenAI
Step 1: Upload Training Data
curl https://api.openai.com/v1/files \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" \
-F purpose="fine-tune" \
-F file="@training_data.jsonl"
Step 2: Start Fine-Tuning
curl https://api.openai.com/v1/fine_tuning/jobs \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"training_file": "file-abc123",
"model": "gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18",
"suffix": "medical-coding"
}'
Step 3: Monitor Training
curl https://api.openai.com/v1/fine_tuning/jobs/ftjob-xxx \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY"
Step 4: Use in OpenClaw
openclaw config set model ft:gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18:org:medical-coding:abc123
openclaw restart
---
Evaluation
Always evaluate your fine-tuned model before deployment:
# Create a test set (separate from training data)
# Run both base and fine-tuned models on the same inputs
# Compare accuracy, consistency, and quality
openclaw say "Test query" --model gpt-4o-mini > base_output.txt
openclaw say "Test query" --model ft:gpt-4o-mini:...:abc123 > finetuned_output.txt
diff base_output.txt finetuned_output.txt
Metrics to Track
| Metric | How to Measure |
|---|
| Accuracy | Correct outputs / total outputs |
|---|
| Consistency | Same input produces same format |
|---|
| Latency | Response time comparison |
|---|
| Cost per request | Token usage comparison |
|---|
| User satisfaction | Feedback from actual usage |
|---|
---
Tips
- Start with prompt engineering before fine-tuning — it is faster and cheaper.
- Use at least 50 high-quality examples for meaningful improvement.
- Separate training and test data to avoid overfitting.
- Fine-tune the smallest model that meets your needs — it is cheaper and faster.
- Version your training data alongside your model versions.
- Re-fine-tune periodically as your requirements evolve.
---
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Solution |
|---|
| Model performance worse than base | Training data quality issue; review examples |
|---|
| Overfitting (memorizes training) | Add more diverse examples, reduce epochs |
|---|
| Fine-tuning job fails | Check data format matches JSONL specification |
|---|
| High cost | Use a smaller base model or fewer examples |
|---|
| Model not available in OpenClaw | Add as custom provider with fine-tuned model ID |
|---|
Related Articles
- Fine-Tuning Small Language Models for Domain-Specific AI Agents — Fine-tune small language models (SLMs) for domain-specific AI agents. Learn techniques, best practices, and code examples for effective adaptation in 2026.
- Advanced Prompt Techniques: Chain-of-Thought and ReAct — Apply advanced prompting strategies like chain-of-thought reasoning and ReAct for complex problem-solving.
- Performance Tuning: Speeding Up OpenClaw — Optimize response times and resource usage for a faster, more efficient OpenClaw experience.
- Which LLM Should Power OpenClaw: GPT, Claude, or Others — A practical guide to choosing the best language model for your OpenClaw agent based on your needs.
- What Is an LLM Context Window — And Why It Matters in 2026 — Understand context windows in plain English: what they are, why they limit AI, and how the new million-token models change everything.